This is not only the accuracy of automatic ‘out’ calls, which have been questioned this week, the players said that they are also very calm.
Redukanu said that she could not hear all calls during her match against Sabalenka at the center court, where the roof was closed and there was noise to biased fans during an entertaining encounter.
“Some of them were slightly calm or the crowds were sluggish,” he said. “But overall you have an idea whether the ball was inside or outside. And then hope that Hawk-I call it equal.”
Sabalenka agreed, “It was very loud and I think people were not even sure it was inside or outside. So there was a little break and then they felt [it out] By scoreboard. ,
When the human line judges were judges, the players could challenge the call using electronic reviews, shown on a large screen. Now the screen has shown the replays of close calls, but they cannot be finished.
Redukanu said that he thought the Hawk-I electronic line calling system “was more accurate in the day when the line was judges and you could challenge”.
“It is difficult to deal with it. [it is] It is a shame that the tradition -like lines and women broke with women, “he said, reflecting the officers wearing clothing, who were a familiar scene around the court.
When it was announced that it would introduce technology this year, Wimbledon said that it is “considered a sufficiently stronger and time is time to take this important step in demanding maximum accuracy in our work”.
Earlier this week, Wimbledon’s Operating Director Michel Diet was asked about the player’s response about the sound level of the call and replied: “The team is clearly working to ensure that it is optimal.
“We are also making sure that it is not very loud and it hinders the drama in the next court. It always happens something that is managed, and teams take all reactions and work on it as we go.”
Wimbledon has not commented on the concerns of the most recent players about accuracy.
