Trump administration said Weekly legal saga That kept the exile in one Military base in Djibouti for weeks.
The Assistant Department of Homeland Security Secretary Trissia McLaglin said that exile flight landed in South Sudan just before midnight EST on Friday. A picture provided by the department showed the exiled, in which their hands and legs were shocking, sitting inside an aircraft, protected by American service members.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 
Exile for South Sudan-a country is plagued by armed conflict and political instability that the US government warns to see the Americans-the government marks an unprecedented new border in the government’s extensive action on the illegal immigration of President Trump.
No exile is from South Sudan. They shout to Cuba, Mexico, Laos, Myanmar, Sudan and Vietnam, and were ordered to be deported from the US after being convicted of crimes including murder, murder, sexual attacks, a child and robbery with robbery.
The high-profile legal battle on the fate of men ended when two federal judges on Friday refused to endeavor attempts by advocates of immigration rights to prevent exile, saying that their hands were bound by the recent orders of the US Supreme Court.
The exile indicates a major political victory for the Trump administration that has sought to convince countries around the world – even though their human rights records – to accept exile who are not their citizens, including convicted of serious crimes.
DHS spokesman McLaglin said, “A district judge cannot determine the National Security and Foreign Policy of the United States.” “This Independence Day is another victory for the safety and safety of American people.”
Exile has also worried the advocates of human rights, who are afraid that men may face torture, torture or other disadvantages in South Sudan. He has argued that the exile of South Sudan is designed to punish men for their crimes, even though they have already served criminal sentences in America
“The US State Department has warned the Americans against all the visit to South Sudan, yet these people have deported these people without any procedure,” said Trina Realmuto said, “The US State Department has reacted these people without any procedure,” said Tina Realmuto said. “Do not make any mistake about it, these exile were punitive and unconstitutional.”
It is not clear how the exempteds in South Sudan will be treated. An attorney of the Department of Justice on Friday told a federal judge that South Sudan informed the US that he would provide a temporary immigration status to men, but the lawyer could not confirm whether he would be detained or not. The Trump administration said in the filing in the court that South Sudani officials have assured that the exiles will not have to face torture.
Earlier this week, the exile of men was made possible by the Supreme Court order. On the request of Trump administration, Supreme Court on Thursday The scope of the earlier order was clarified that he had issued a lower court’s decision to stop, which was stopping the third party countries without any procedure and notice of notice.
The April Lower Court verdict by US District Judge Brian Murphy at Massachusetts required the Trump administration to give adequate notice to the prisoners and to give any country a chance to interview by an American refugee officer before any exile. The case thwarted several exile efforts, including a plan to send detainees to Libya.
When he learned about the administration’s plan to deport eight people to South Sudan in May, Murphy blocked the effort that gave the US a chance to maintain prisoners’ custody and give them a chance to fight their exile. The administration transferred the prisoners to the camp lemonier naval base, where American officials described dangerous situationsWith concerns about malaria, rocket attacks, insufficient safety protocols and triple-design outdoor temperature.
But Supreme Court last month Murphy’s decision was suspended from April. And on Thursday, it said that Murphy can no longer allow the government to compete with the prisoners in Djibouti, as the order to reduce that requirement was stopped.
Hours later, advocates of immigrant rights asked Randolf Moss a separate federal judge at Washington, DC to stop the exile to South Sudan. He did this on Friday, but only briefly before saying that the request should be controlled by Murphy.
Moss expressed concern about the risks for men’s “physical safety” and said that the US government should not be in the business of provoking “pain and suffering” on those who have already been serving their sentence, even for “terrible crimes”. But he said that his hands were tied, telling the advocates that he needs to ask Murphy for any intervention.
Later on Friday, Murphy refused to request the advocates’ requests, stating that the Supreme Court orders were “binding”.
