NewNow you can hear Fox News article!
House speaker Mike Johnson hopes that he will bring President Donald Trump“One Big Beautiful Bill” for a vote on Wednesday afternoon or evening.
If he is successful and passes the “OBBB” and is on the path of the President’s table, the column has overtaken the events -the incidents have been extended due to the passage of OBBB, meaning away from the American economy.
If, however, four or more Republicans bolted Cocks, turned on the President and his party, and the economy, border, energy sector and especially to protect the nation and polled “no”, break the glass and pull the liver.
Democratic doctors protest against Trump’s ‘Sundar Bill’ derailed due to floods of American capital tourists
OBBB is not the kind of bill that can avoid a conference and score a second run through legislative course. A lot of narrow choke-point was navigated to reach this decision point. To distribute this delicately balanced high stack of a “conference committee” to the party and President Trump to distribute this delicately balanced high stack to the party and President Trump to distribute this delicately balanced high stack to a “Conference Committee”.
In my view, an ideal bill or any other supervisor and most of the Congress members is not an ideal bill in the eyes. This is a very good bill, however, and should not be the enemy of good right.
The most vocal critic of OBBB is self-dominated “Defisit Hawks” (as well as Kentki’s odd balls Congressmen Massey, who believe that their job is to be interviewed on television.)
It is not possible to deduct more than the effect of the bill on the deficit without starting, and “start” means failure to distribute.
Again, the margin of the house and the Senate GOP is very narrow for expecting a different result. Shooting of “OBBB” now means shooting below. Members who vote “no” will be responsible for the greatest tax growth in history and American military readiness as well as continuous decline in underfunded border petrol and incomplete walls.
Republican voting “can be” from “” safe districts “, but it is very clear that GOP writ big and President Trump will especially recruit and fund the primary challenges for them and if they are not successful, they will encourage voters to send honest barriers and leftist instead of grand standers.
However, there is one thing that can catch members of the President and Chairman Sadan who want more deduction to spend: the opportunity to write and manage the second reconciliation bill.
Earlier this year, two reconciliation bills were arguing for bills and the first reconciliation bill for a trimming spending on defense spending, and then for the purpose of waste, fraud and misconduct with those programs, a second for a lot of probation and tax deduction and tax deduction and entitled reforms.
President Trump, anytime a dealener, pushed the principle to “OBBB”-which has been proved right-that the GOP would not risk an increase by the assassination-killing economy to reach by January 1, 2026, unless “OBBB” stops it first. Trump bets on speed and thus he is still winning that condition.
The house has “true believers” who want to cut deep expenses. If they blow the OBBB this week, they would say that they are counting on the house and the Senate Gop, so that the pieces can be rebuilt but with more cuts. This will definitely not happen. It is also not a Mrigatrishna. This is a counter-reality. This will not happen. See Senate Vote: 50-50. The whole weight that tolerates the bill is in it. Pass it or welcome a large scale tax growth of 2026!
The current spending in the bill threatened its passage in the Senate. The slices are slightly deep and the deal is dead. The dead-ender in the house may want to believe that something else may be, but the lines below are killing the “OBBB”, now it means killing it forever. Republicans, who voted against “OBBB”, are now voting to crash the economy between November 2026, and thus a Democrat majority in the House and all fiscal irresponsibleness that telegraph in markets. This will be a bloodbase in the markets and fine.
“OBBB” has “yes” votes for “not” no “vote speaker Jeffreies and the increase in mass spending will take place with his arrival with Herald with heavy tax increase.
The losses with the losses that were more promised to them and probably were. But each senator also gets a vote and has reached the limits of Senate hunger for collective deficit cuts. This is the best that can be done on this period of reconciliation.
The President and the speaker who can offer hold is control of the second round of reconciliation, a second round that has the right to take this Congress.
Representative Chip Roy, Andy Harris and Ralph Norman should be put into the in -charge of its management on the drafting of that bill and the house floor. No guarantee of passage can be given -House GOP has moderates that will have to persuade, but the President and Chairman can provide strong support for attempt. Losses with losses can come up with thread that can make it the smallest of the eyes of many needles: the real improvement of the antitite.
If there are members who want social security to become insolvency, or the entire discretionary expenses will be indifferent to the reforms entitled by eating the budget and paying the budget. But in both the houses of the Congress, responsible members of both sides would have to realize that the President of the Federal Reserve was correct when he declared on Tuesday that “the loan level is durable, but not the way.”
“We need to address that soon or later,” Powell continued. “Soon better than later.”
“Soon” may mean now and if fiscal hooks are allowed to prepare a entitled improvement bill for the second reconciliation bill, the one who uses the largest weapon in the arsenal against the national loan. With a well -designed bill, they could also close it.
Remember “BRAC” commissions? Since 1988, on five different occasions, the Congress gave a very sensitive task to nominate American military installations to close an independent commission, in which the hearing took place and prepared a list of bases for closure. Every local
The Congress knew that their bull could be gore, but they also knew that the country needed to trim the size and scale of domestic military installations. So the Congress established and empowered BRACS, and BRACS did its work. The Congress was eventually presented the list and, by design, the Congress can only vote in the entire list “yes” or “no”. By forcing all the Congress to deal with all the bandes, the pain was shared and the recommendations of BRCS were always accepted. Since 1988, five BRAC rounds discontinue more than 350 military installations, which saves significant costs and frees resources for other priorities.
We need such a procedure for the idea of ​​such approach to a eligibility reform commission and the Congress’ recommendations.
Click here for more Fox News Rai
Communicate the easiest improvement to propose and pass: Adding one month to retirement age eligibility tables every year for the next 60 years. This would mean an increase of one year at the age of eligibility – for example from 65 to 66 to 66, and every dozen years, and our collective long life will help to conform to social security for actual tables, reflecting the expansion of our collective long life. For people under 55, keep slowly moving reforms and the final result is that all Americans under 55 will not get social security checks until the age of 66 years. This is a very gentle but necessary bending of the cost curve for entitlement.
Other careful, include such a proposal in a package of gradual corrections that are confused with our entitlement and then arrange a full package to get an up-or-down vote in the Congress’s lame-down session in December 2026.
Losses may demand the right to make efforts and really fix the deficit. And they should get it.
But is it what they want, or they wish to face the viral video that are here today and have gone before the sundown?
Click here to get Fox News app
This is a very serious moment in the life of the country. To make a tax structure permanent that rewards investment and risk, this is the most important thing that the Congress can do to guarantee a lively, growing economy. It is important for our safety to re -prepare our defense stockpiles and accelerate ships and submarines. Along with permanent adoption of that tax code, preventing immediate necessary investment in defense and border security will be careless.
But if enough short -sighted Grandstanders get up to block OBBB, make them a proposal that they cannot deny: responsibility for more than speeches.
Huga Havit is a Fox News contributor, and heard the host of “The Hug Houg Havit Show”, from 3 pm to 6 pm on Salem Radio Network and for Simulcast on Salem News Channel. The Huga takes America home on the East Coast and has lunch on the West Coast on over 400 colleagues, and on all the streaming platforms where SNC can be seen. He is a consecutive guest on the news roundate of Fox News Channel, who has been hosted in ET at 6 pm by Brett Baire Weekend. Ohio’s son and a university graduate of Harvard College and Michigan Law School, Hewitt since 1996, is a law professor at the Fauler School of Law of Chapman University, where he teaches constitutional laws. Hewitt launched its nominated radio show from Los Angeles in 1990. Havit often appeared on every major National News Television Network, hosting television shows for PBS and MSNBCs, written for every major American paper, written to a dozen books and a score of Republican candidate debate, recently in the Republican Republican Debate in the Republican Debate. Hewitt focused on his radio show and his column on the Constitution, National Security, American politics and Cleveland Brown and parents. Hewitt, ranging from Democrat Hillary Clinton and John Kerry to Republican President George W. Thousands of guests have been interviewed in their 40 years in broadcasting from Bush and Donald Trump in their 40 years, and this column today previews the major story running their radio/ TV shows.
Click here to read more than Huga Havit
