BBC Scotland News
A woman who was arrested for participating in an anti -abortion protest outside a hospital in Glasgow will not take any further action.
The 75 -year -old Rose Dosureti was the first person to be accused under a new law to create a buffer zone outside the Scottish abortion clinic.
She was participating in a demonstration close to Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (QEUH) in February.
Ms. Dochaure had earlier rejected a formal warning from the Crown Office, in which BBC Scotland was reported It was “unjust”.
The Abortion Services (Saus Zone) Act, which came into force last year, is aimed at preventing the harassment of patients. Those who break the law can be fined up to £ 10,000 or unlimited amount in more severe cases.
The Crown Office and Procuretor Fiscal Service (COPFS) said that she had carefully considered the case of Ms. Dochaure and decided not to take any further action.
She said she was “happy” with the news, saying: “I think it is a victory for general knowledge.”
QEUH doctors had earlier said that the protests, which have been held outside the hospital for nearly 10 years, were held. Hapler For patients and employees.
In protest against February, Ms. Dochaure gave an indication that “forced is a crime, to talk here, only if you want”.
After his arrest, the Crown Office sent him a formal warning.
It said that Procuretor Fiscal had decided against bringing Ms. Dutureti in front of a court and if she accepted the warning, she would not be prosecuted.
But she refused to accept the warning as she believed that it was “unjust”.
“I just did what I thought was right,” he told BBC Scotland News on Thursday.
“To stand on the streets of Glasgow, it should be warned that if anyone wants to come to you, it is offering to talk – it already seems to be already.”
He said that “there was no need for law in the first place” as the police already have powers to intimidate and deal with harassment.
Ms. Dochaure said: “Procuretor Fiscal has withdrawn the warning to make it seem that I was not breaking the law.
“This buffer zone law is all about intimidation, harassment and affecting.
“There is nothing intimidating or disturbing anything about an elderly woman that offers to lend to a hearing ear on the roadside.”
Asked if she would return to hold a sign outside the hospital, she said: “Life moves forward for people and I decide and when I think I want to do something, but I don’t think I am afraid that I am afraid.”
He told earlier BBC scotast That she must have agreed to go to jail during the incident.
A Crown Office spokesperson said: “COPF professional prosecutors considered the report. All Scotland prosecutors work freely with political influence.
“After carefully considering the facts and circumstances of the case, including the allowable evidence available, it was decided that no further action should be taken at this time.
“Crown has the right to take action in relation to this incident in future.”
‘Cruel and ruthless’
Abortion field law Last September was implemented.
The Scottish Greens was prepared by MSP Gilian McKay, who said that women seeking this process were subjected to “completely unacceptable misconduct and interruption” outside hospitals.
Within the buffer zone, it is a criminal offense to behave in a way that can affect the decisions of women and employees to reach services.
It is also a crime to prevent women and employees from entering the clinic or otherwise alarm, harassment or crisis.
The law prevents any protests or clums from stopping within 200 meters (650 ft) of 30 clinics across the country.
Dr. A doctor in Greg Irwin, QEUH was painted Facing a group of protesters in February 2023,
At that time, he said that anti -abortion workers were “threatening” women trying to reach the hospital and “troubled” employees.
Dr. Irwin described the protests as “an incredibly cruel and ruthless talk”.
US Vice President JD Vance, Who is Currently visiting Scotland On a family holiday, criticized the buffer zone earlier this year.
He Use of laws as an example The free speech in Europe is not protecting and claimed that people who live in safe access areas were sent by the Scottish government to pray about praying inside their homes.
A Skottish government spokesman said that he had not sent such letters, and was covered only by the “intentional or careless behavior” Act.