In all the interventions of the Sir Kire Stmper on a potential Ukrainian peace process, their careful public pronunciation seems to have a significant difference between more practical personal views.
The only continuous Russia’s President Putin’s regular condemnation of PM and support for President Zelanski.
Some people argue that the starrer strategy is intelligent on handling complex dialogues by incorporating the leaders of the unexpected world.
There was significant concern about Alaska meeting between President Putin and Trump on Friday in Westminster.
Still Britain’s minister was diplomat and avoided the porous language of former PM Boris Johnson.
He Called that meeting “The most vomiting-induction episode in all Taudri history of international diplomacy”.
Sir Keir has not clearly said this, but I have been told that the UK government privately accepts the basis of “land for land” – Ukraine Russia as part of the peace deal with Russia as Ukraine Seeding Area.
This can only include the land already under the control of the Russian army, but it still indicates a painful process for the kiev.
However, no 10 sources have insisted that any question about the region is eventually a case for Ukraine and Ukraine.
“There are three issues”, a British officer told me. “How many land, which land, and what really or de jure.”
This final issue refers to a potential gray area in the conversation. Ukraine can accept the land as a “real” Russian region because Moscow controls it military. Or it can be accepted as Russian “de jure” and is legally recognized internationally.
I have been told that the UK government is expecting two things from the visit of today’s people’s leaders to the White House.
First of all he wants to encourage President Zelansky to listen to and consider what Donald Trump is offering. Memories of the argument of the February Oval office remain fresh and all are eager to avoid repeating one.
Secondly, Keer Stmper and their European colleagues want to detail what they expect “Ironclad” will have a safety guarantee – in this event a peace deal is hit by Ukraine’s protecting and rescue measures.
The “Game Changing” has been given evidence in 10 in 10 as the recent support of these proposed security guarantee of Trump Envoy Steve Witcoff is that the months of work on Stamor and Macron’s ‘coalition’ is finally being paid.
Sources in the UK government say that many people had argued that this effort would not be an irrelevance or not, and still the contrary is now the case.
The role of Sir Keir in the White House today is likely to rely on the rarity of his strong relationship with both Trump and Zelanski. The PM is eager to continue his role as a diplomat ‘bridge’ between the White House and European leaders.
But what will be the contribution of Donald Trump in fact?
Witkoff said that “the United States can provide security like Article 5”, a reference Block of NATO Treaty Which underlines his principle of collective defense.
Zelancesi has praised it as a “historical decision”.
But a firm, public, can calm concerns in London, Paris, Berlin and Rome on the camera commitment as the role of America from President Trump.
A UK government formula described the role of President Trump in the Ukraine-Russia peace talks as “practice in raw power”.
The UK authorities assess that Donald Trump would be stressed to make a deal to every American muscle.
He ideally wants to bring Western countries together, yet he believes that his hunger for peace extended the desire to ensure that European leaders have been neglected.
Calculation of Keer Stmper seems to be helpful and practical for now, even though his enmity and doubt towards Vladimir Putin is not shared by the US President.
