NewNow you can hear Fox News article!
The federal testing gamblers of Scene “Didi” Combes were stunned on Tuesday after reaching the decision of one in four of the five cases against the rapper.
Two months after the test, and about 14 hours in the discussion, the gamblers told Judge Arun Subramanian that they were unable to reach a unanimous judgment on a raccizing charge.
The prosecution called over 30 witnesses at the stand during seven weeks of testimony, while Didi’s defense team rested without calling any witnesses on its behalf – former federal prosecutor and Fox News contributor tray Gowdy is considered a “high stake poker”.
Didi jury sex trafficking, reaches partial decision in raccizing trial
Experts say that Didi’s rescue did not call the witnesses to the stand and played “High Stax Poker”. (Jane Rosenburg)
“Usually, when Raksha does not call witnesses, the defendant is called a prisoner,” Gowdi explained. “I have said that my whole career. It is a fancy way to call someone a prisoner. You give a reason for proper doubt to the jury and just say that the prosecution has not fulfilled its burden … Most of the gamblers do not really understand what the burden is.”
He said, “The jury will have to give a reason for doubt and if you do not protect a very important, then what you do is a cross-cruel witness, then you are going to be a prisoner.”
Didi defense claims that he was wrongly targeted, while the prosecution says the rapper thought he was ‘untouchable’
Didi told the court last week that it was her decision not to test her sexual offenses. The judge asked if Didi understands that she has the right to testify or not, and if she discussed her rights with her lawyer. Didi replied, “Yes, well,” before accepting that it was “completely my decision” not to testify in his sexual offenses testing.
The gamblers began to consult on Monday, 30 June, and out of the five cases, a decision for the racketering charge could not agree, which was one of the most serious cases against the infamous music Mogul. A federal recon violation may result in a sentence of 20 years. Transport of engaging in prostitution can take a sentence of up to 10 years, while by sex trafficking Force, fraud or force Can be sentenced to 20 years.
Scene for sex crimes, the federal test of the scene “Didi” Combes was unable to reach a decision on Tuesday in all five cases. (Jane Rosenburg)
“It is very complex – most of the lawyers cannot explain Rico, so to expect 12 people, to understand a criminal enterprise average citizen gamblers, acts of acts … it is just a lot to ask,” Gowdy said. “Even if you don’t win, there is a reason to charge it. It opens a clear doors that can be closed, so many times the prosecutor will charge something because it enables you to get additional evidence before a jury, even if you don’t really expect to make a guilty decision on that count.”
Like what are you reading? Click here for more entertainment news
Criminal defense attorney John W DayOwner of Santa F, New Mexico-based Law Practice John de lawFox News told Digital that the gamblers may have difficult times to understand the Rico charge.
“Was the sister’s high-an ups and perhaps disturbing lifestyle, or can you really choose a criminal enterprise that is equal to an organized crime family?” The day said. “But tomorrow morning the judges would be hoping that after one night of thinking about it, the gamblers will have another idea about the decision of a partition on Rico – one way or the other – and the most serious accusation should come back with a unanimous decision on that most serious accusation.”
Cas Ventura gave emotional testimony during the scene “Didi” Comombs “federal testing. (Jane Rosenburg)
Potential jurner issues several times threatened the scene “Didi” Comombs trial. (Jane Rosenburg)
Criminal defense attorney Nicole Blanc Baker, Joe R. Kelly represented, stated that the bill against Didi was “building blocks” to set up a reco charge. A jury may or may not be seen or not.
“So what happens is now they are forced to go back there, and there is probably going to be very desperate there, fighting back and forth,” said Baker. “My understanding is that the action of the gamblers was something for the effect of the fact that they are at a point where there is unattained opinion on both sides. So some gamblers are clearly thinking,” Okay, of course, he is guilty. “
The judge directed the jury to continue discussion for now. A second option will be to give supplementary jury instructions. Finally, the jury may return a partial decision. However, Judge Subramanian said that he is not considering the third option at this point, and chose a portion of the jury charge to re -read.
Criminal defense attorney Eric FadisColorado -based founder partner Warner FadisIt was agreed that the Rico charge was the most complex in all the allegations.
Click here to sign up for entertainment newsletter
“The jury can be hung on various requirements of the allegations, including the criminal enterprise,” Fadis said. “I suspect that there may be a sticky point because the government did not accuse any co-speculators and never called any other alleged members of this criminal enterprise.”
See: Prosecutors accused Didi of running ‘criminal venture’
He said, “At this point, it is not clear whether a partial decision can give rise to any basis for appeal.”
The government insisted in its argument that Didi runs an alleged criminal venture With complete control. The prosecution reported that the jury heard the testimony, saw the texts, saw the bank records and heard the audio allegedly “last night” rapper committing a crime for crime for decades.
According to the prosecution, the government showed that Didi did not take to reply. Assistant American Attorney Christine Slavick said, “Aaj Tak, Didi was able to get away from crime due to money and power.” “He stops now.”
According to Austin -based criminal rescue lawyer, the decision for four counts came “quite early”, ” Sam Baiceet,
Didi was arrested in several cases in September. (Stan Honda/Getty Images)
“It seems that the jury has struggled and spent most of its time arguing over the more serious and complex raccizing count,” Baset said. “If I was defense, I would be worried, but you never know what a jury would do. For this long time of a test, the 13-hour idea is on the small part of expectations.”
When the jury was brought back to court, the judge asked him to keep him deliberately, saying that it is their duty to discuss and make opinion among themselves.
Click here to get Fox News app
Judge Subramanian said that gamblers should reach a unanimous decision, but should not leave their faults only to return a decision or satisfy the rest of the gamblers. The jury was then rejected back to the jury room. Court concluded after 5 pm, and the jury was asked to return before 9 am on Wednesday.
“Both sides stated that they do not want to accept partial decision,” Attorney David S. Sailtzer told Fox News Digital. “This forces the jury to submit a full decision, which eventually can give rise to a hung jury on counting on the issue if they cannot give a decision on all calculations, and thus lead a potential return on a hung count.
“For appellate issues, there will be many, and depending on how the matter resolves, it can be another issue for the appeal.”
