New Delhi: Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Wednesday responded to the government’s opposition’s criticism on the Pahgam terror attack during the Operation Sindoor debate. As Amit Shah woke up to speak, India walked out of the upper house, opposing Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s absence and said he had expected to respond to him. Shah dismissed the protest, saying that the government had made it clear in the Business Advisory Council (BAC) that he would decide who would speak on his behalf.The Union Home Minister said, “I know why these people (India blocks) are walking out – they are doing this because, for years, they did nothing to stop terrorism due to their vote bank politics … that’s why they cannot even tolerate to listen to this debate,” the Union Home Minister said.Pahalgam on terrorist attack“In Pahalgam, our citizens were brutally killed, elected and shot in front of their religion, after being asked by their religion. I expressed my heartfelt condolences to all of those families who lost their lives.On operation vermilion
- “We attacked him (Pakistan) terrorist camps, pads launching terror and terror training camps, but he (Pakistan) considered it an attack on his country as an attack. As a response, as a response, on 8 May, Pakistan attacked residential areas and defense installations in India. India attacked and destroyed 11 defense establishments of Pavistan.
- “They (opposition leaders) are asking who the ceasefire took place at the request of whose request was done. Pakistan, brought to his knees, called the Director General of our military operations (DGMO) and pleaded to stop. From the very beginning, we were not war, we were not war, nor we were also trying to raise this matter, some people were trying to raise this matter and raise questions …
On Operation Mahadev
- “For the security forces behind Operation Sindoor and Operation Mahadev, who brought respect in India, I expand my heartfelt gratitude and salute their bravery. I also want to praise my deepest for Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who pledged to reply to the firm as per the wishes of 1.4 billion Indians.
- “Under Operation Mahadev, our armed forces successfully killed three terrorists. Among them, Suleman, a commander,
Lashkar-e-Taiba (Come on), was identified as a person who set fire during the initiative attack. Hamza Afghani, also a commander of Late, was abolished by another high ranking operative during the operation. Additionally, a senior terrorist Zibran was among those killed by a late late. Evidence unevenly indicates to involve Lashkar-e-Tabiba’s Pahalgam attack, “Shah said. - He said, “During the security review meeting held after the Pahalgam attack, it was decided that terrorists should be arrested as soon as possible. More severe, measures were taken to ensure that they could not flee the country. As a result, 100 days after the attack, criminals were located and neutralized,” he said.
- “Intelligence Bureau (IB) came to know about the location of terrorists on 22 May. After this, IB and military intelligence further investigated. Around July 22, their exact location was identified. Three terrorists were killed. I have received many messages from all over the country, especially from families of those who were actually killed,”
Chidambaram attacks, Congress -led UP era criticisms
- “Chidambaram ji raised a question, asking that the terrorists were Pakistani. He openly challenged the justification of Operation Sindoor. It raises an important question: Who was trying to protect Chidambaram ji, Pakistan, Lashkar-e-Tabiba (late), or terrorists themselves?” Shah asked.
- “Interestingly, the day he raised this question, terrorists were neutralized, underlining the urgency and need of such operations.
Congress party Those who are ready for votebank politics, bending towards supporting Pakistan, preserving terrorist organizations such as LAT, and offering rhetoric to terrorists, said. - “People of this country are seeing the mindset of the Congress party. It is not their priority.
National security But politics. Their priority is not to eliminate terrorism, but to protect their vote bank. The Union Home Minister said that his priority is not securing our limits, but is involved in appeasement politics.