New York Appellate Court overturned Angoran’s $ 500M verdict against Trump

In New York, a court revealed that a prominent citizen had baked books in reality by inflating suspicious figures without any support. In addition, his wild overwelling was widely seen by his self-invasive. The final reported figures are so absurd that they were rejected in their entirety. Finally, he was more than half a billion dollars.

The man is Judge Arthur Angoran.

The New York Appellate Court unanimously crushed the irony after Angoran’s absurd half-Billion-Dollar verdict and interest against President Donald Trump. It was Angoran that felt, as he characterized Trump’s witnesses, “only reality was denied.” This made his notorious dependence on the assessment of Mar-e-Lago between $ 18 million and $ 27.6 million, which seems like good accounting.

NY Appeals Court Latitia James throws a $ 500M fine against Trump in Civil Case

Finally, he did not find a single judge to preserve a dollar of that fine.

For some of us who covered that test, the most vivid image of Angoran came out in the beginning. He indicated that he did not want the camera in the court room, but when the network showed, Angoran took off his glasses and Felt for the currency for cameras,

it was A “sunset bulleward” moment. We only need to talk to Gloria Swanson in the camera to talk to “those amazing people out in the dark”! And the announcement “All is well, [Ms. James]I am ready for my close-up. ,

US Appeal Court Block Trump contempt proceedings were ordered by Boseberg

Close-up was not a good idea, and, on the appeal, it was completely disastrous. The court found a little legal or factual basis for its fine. The alleged witnesses not only lost a penny, but they testified that they earned money on debt and wanted new loans with the Trump administration. It did not move to Engoron. From the beginning, he was talking to those “wonderful people”.

You did not have to go far. In New York, in both Trump’s civil and criminal trials, there was a carnival environment on the road outside the courthouse. It was not really as humiliating as a babble. Democrats New York’s Attorney General Latitia James directly injected the lofty to the veins of New Yorkers. James was selected on the basis of his entertaining rather than a legal appeal, pledging in his campaign to bag (without harassing any crime or violation to take the name of violation).

Nevertheless, James could not succeed if he was not ready to ignore the reality and cook books on fine. He needed a companion in Lafe. He needed Engoron.

Even for some anti -Trump commentators, the decision was impossible to defend the decision and some admitted that they had never seen any such case that was brought to New York.

Turley provoked Trump’s ‘tremendous victory’ after the civil fraud penalty, the Blast ‘Grutsk’ of the NY Act is used

Judge David Freedman gave Angoran a close-up, which would have made Swansan Vins. He expanded how the underlying law “has never been used in the way used in this case – that is, to attack successful, private, commercial transactions, a hand length between highly sophisticated parties, which are able to completely monitor and defend their own interests.”

Click here for more Fox News Rai

He accused Angoran of participating in an attempt clearly by James, “President Trump’s political career derailed and ended with the destruction of his real estate business”.

Other judges stated that Angoran’s fine was away from the base and said that it was an unconstitutional order under the eighth amendment, protecting citizens from “cruel and unusual” punishment. Therefore, Angoran not only inflated the figures, but also cut the constitution in his attempt to give a blow against Trump.

Trump can now appeal to the residual parts of the Angoran decision that imposes the border on the Trump family in New York. Some of those boundaries can be mooted by the time of any final decision. The irony is that if Angoran showed a modicum of restraint, he must have won a win. During the test in New York, I said that it would have been smart to implement a dollar fine and limited prohibitory orders. However, a modicum of judicial restraint and decision was required.

Click here to get Fox News app

Instead, Angoran chose to discredit the ladder. He was away from half a billion dollars, which could put him in the Judge’s Burney Madoff category.

In other words, if he wanted to remember that first day, Arthur Angoran was successful.

Click here to read more than Jonathan Turley