A tribunal found that Michael Jackson was dismissed after accusing a colleague to a colleague, found by a tribunal.
Lucasz Zavadzsky was accused of making noise high-or-no “no” no “no” no “no” noise.
A member of the Black Staff also accused Mr. Zawadzsky that he made a “noise to the monkey”.
Zawadzski acknowledged “embarrassing and adolescent” behavior, but denied racism and a tribunal in Manchester ordered that he should pay more than £ 10,000 in compensation to lose his job.
The co-worker, referred to as SM in the tribunal, told Mr. Zawadzsky to his manager for bullying.
Mr. Zavadzsky was told that he was accused of “shouting noise in Michael Jackson’s style”.
He later confessed to making “Granting and Karah” noise with another colleague.
He agreed that they could be described as “intercourse” and it was “not appropriate” in the workplace.
Mr. Zavadzsky also said that a work colleague had commented on his “high-high laugh”, but refused to implement Michael Jackson and make a noise to the monkey, saying that he had no desire to “threaten or hurt anyone”.
The tribunal heard that she was suspended after an alleged violation of a policy of bullying, harassment and discrimination, especially a colleague making unfair comments to create injury and crisis “.
Employment Judge Carol Porter said in his judgment: “In short, the claimant’s misconduct was unfair and adolescent conduct in the workplace.
“There was no satisfactory evidence before the dismissal officer was aggressive to that particularly accepted conduct SM, or caused him a crisis.
“There was no satisfactory evidence in front of the dismissal officer that the claimant was engaged in the noise, in bullying or harassment.
“The claimant gave clear evidence, which was not denied, that he had worked with SM for a long time and SM never told him that he found this unfair and teenage behavior aggressive.”
He also found that “the claimant was not aware of the company’s zero-oppression policy in relation to inappropriate and adolescent behavior in the workplace” or “I received any warning that such behavior was unacceptable”.
