An allegation against Mark Gordon, a rapist convicted his newborn killing with his fellow Constance Marten, failing to report to the police, while the sexual criminals have been dropped on the register.
Gordon was accused of failing to follow the notification requirements between 3 January and 27 February 2023, when the couple were on run.
After the prosecution, he did not guilty that it would not provide any evidence and it was not in public interest that the allegations given to his other convicts should be carried forward.
Gordon, 51, and Marten, 38, will be sentenced to the mangilator with the gross negligence of his daughter, Victoria next month, Earlier this year after a long and chaotic return.
The earlier test found the couple guilty for hiding the birth of a child, completing the syllabus of justice by not reporting his death and hair cruelty.
He will be sentenced on 15 September – more than two years after Victoria’s disintegrated body was discovered in a shopping bag in Briton.
It is believed that the couple went to the run to escape from the authorities and Victoria, to keep their fifth child together, after taking care of their four other children.
Gordon had allegedly failed to report the police regularly as a registered criminal Found guilty of rape in America in 1989Before returning to Britain, he had sentenced to 20 years in jail.
At a hearing at Old Bailey on Monday, Judge Mark Lucraft KC told Gordon that the case would be demolished if he is not guilty.
Gordon asked the judge if he could have five minutes, during which he squat in a corner of the video link room in HMP Belmarsh and appeared to argue with himself.
When he returned, he told the court, “How else could I request?
“Of course ‘is not’ not guilty ‘.”
Gordon – which was not represented by a lawyer at the end of retriel related to Victoria’s death – also told the court that he was still having trouble finding a lawyer for hearing the sentence in September.
“People are probably reluctant to take the matter due to the negative publicity of the case,” he said.
“I do not depend on the challenge of representing myself. I do not know the law. It’s too much for me. I can’t do that.”
But Judge Lusraft refused to delay and said the case, which went on two long -running trials, was already “extremely expensive”.
“The boot is on your leg to get representation,” he said to him, saying that the court “will proceed to punishment, even if you are unrestricted”.
