Japan, Australia asked to define role in potential US-China conflict over Taiwan

The Pentagon is reportedly putting pressure on Indo-Pacific colleagues Japan and Australia to make it clear what roles they would play in a war with China in a war with China.

Pentagon’s policy head Elbridge Kolbie questioned the Japanese and Australian Defense Officers during recent meetings, the Financial Times stated for the first time.

While the United States has long urged Indo-Pacific colleagues to increase defense spending as China enhances its military activity around Taiwan, this push for specific warship commitments is a new development-and allegedly caught foreign authorities.

Australia replied that it would not do soldiers before any struggle.

Taiwan envoy urged Congress action, warned of China threatening after meeting MPs

Defense Minister Pat Connoys told Australian Broadcasting Corporation, “The decision to commit Australian soldiers for a struggle will be decided by the day government.” “We will not discuss the imaginary.”

Australia and America are currently leading a major joint exercise in Sydney which includes 30,000 soldiers from 19 countries.

Pentagon officials cited NATO’s efforts that Asian colleagues should consider as a model to promote European defense spending. At the same time, Kolby has advised European colleagues to prioritize the dangers of the house instead of focusing on Indo-Pacific, sources told Fox News Digital.

“Some of our colleagues can’t welcome Frank conversations,” Kolby posted on X in response to the report.

“But as the department has made the department abundantly and constantly clear, we are focusing on the President’s implementation of the US and implementing the general knowledge agenda to restore the US and achieve peace through strength. This includes urging colleagues to pursue their defense expenses and other efforts related to our collective defense.”

Kolby’s China-centered Pentagon Playbook sparks Ukraine Arms Freeze

The question of friendly commitments by the American policy of strategic ambiguity is more complicated, under which Washington clearly does not explain whether it would defend Taiwan if China invades.

Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell wrote on X to protect Kolby’s view, “As secretary Hegseth said, the Defense Department focuses on stopping war, with a strong shield.” “This requires strength – but it is a simple fact that our colleagues should also share their own.

Former President Joe Biden repeatedly stated that the US would defend Taiwan, only for the White House employees later to return those comments and insisted that the US policy has not changed.

President Donald Trump has maintained the tradition of ambiguity, publicly refusing to declare how he would respond. However, the new audio received by CNN revealed that Trump told the donors last year that they had threatened both Russia and China with military force.

“I said with Putin,” If you go to Ukraine, I am going to bomb [expletive] Outside Moscow, “said Trump. “I am telling you. I have no choice.” And then [Putin] Goes, like, ‘I don’t believe you.’ But he believed me 10%. ,

“I said the same thing [Xi]”Trump said.” I said, ‘If you go to Taiwan, I am going to bomb [expletive] Out of Beijing. ‘I said,’ I have no choice. I got you to drive the bomb. ,

At other times, Trump criticized the cost of defending Taiwan and argued that the island should dedicate 10% of its budget to protect.

Wargaming simulation suggests that Japan will be the most important partner for the United States and Taiwan, as South Korea has not authorized American forces to start war operations from its territory. Australia does not allow permanent foreign military bases, but the US is expanding its rotational appearance in Australian features.

“Japan is always important, and when I say important, as we cannot win a war without them,” Mark Canian, Defense Expert Mark Canian of Center for Strategic and International Studies, regularly told Fox News Digital, who brothers MPs on China Vargemes.

He said, “Their forces are important, but our ability to use our bases in Japan is important,” he said that other American base in Indo-Pacific like Guam was far away to serve as a hub.

Taiwan operated a live-fire drill with tanks made by America as the President seems to be

Does Japan allow America to keep its war -time operations in its region at the center, an important question would be that a war is sure to come in preparation for the contingency of a war.

The US and Japan have practiced armies running under the Japanese Ryukyu Island series, the closest of which is only 80 miles from the coast of Taiwan.

Kolby’s push and reviews a review of his initiation of his initiation for his initiation roles, aims to supply Australia with US-made nuclear-managed submarines.

Click here to get Fox News app

The Pentagon recently defended Kolby after the report that he had temporarily stopped military aid in Ukraine – quickly an order by Trump quickly.

Under the Oukas Agreement, Australia will purchase several virginia-class submarines in the early 2030s, while a new class of submarines will be jointly developed by the US, UK and Australia. Production in Australia is expected to begin in the 2040s. However, the US is already struggling to produce enough submarines for its Navy.