National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard on Wednesday arrested additional material on assessment of intelligence community in Russia’s works 2016 electionClaiming on a social media Post And in a press briefing at the White House that he showed the “manufactured” information to the Obama administration officials to reduce the then candidate Donald Trump.
His statement on X stated that Obama officials had “built an assessment of the January 2017 intelligence community that they knew that they were lies, promoting lies that Vladimir Putin and Russian government helped President Trump win the 2016 election.”
Democrats disputed his claims and accused Gabbard of incorrectly presenting intelligence conclusions. Wednesday’s report follows a different set of different documents on the case. Gabbard released on FridayIn a memorandum with those documents, he similarly accused Obama administration officials of plotting “long coup for years long” against Mr. Trump.
Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbash said in a statement about the first set of material, “These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt on distraction,” and he said that there is nothing in the documents of the last week “nothing is widely accepted conclusions underlined that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election, but did not successfully manage any vote.” Rodenbush has not responded to the most recent release of the material.
Wednesday’s release was a dilapidated report compiled by the Republican Majority of the House Intelligence Committee in 2017 – where FBI director Kash Patel was a prominent employee at that time, according to two sources familiar with the case. It focuses on length on the decision of the intelligence community that Russian President Vladimir Putin has desired to help President Trump win 2016 election.
This includes a discussion of raw intelligence provided by a human source to the CIA, as well as the signal intercepts collected by the National Security Agency, inspire concerns from the current and former intelligence officials and condemn the democrats, which can be about risks for sensitive intelligence sources and methods.
But the report does not fundamentally change the previous assessment by the US Intelligence community – or several reviews after that.
Mark Warner, Vice Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in a statement, “Participation of the participation and irresponsible release risks some of the most sensitive sources and methods and uses to spy on Russia and protect Americans.” “And in doing so, director Gabbard is sending a cool message to our colleagues and assets worldwide: the United States can no longer rely to protect the intelligence you shared.”
On Monday at the White House Briefing, Gabbard accused President Obama of “leading the creation of this intelligence evaluation”. He told reporters that the documents would be sent to the Department of Justice and the FBI to investigate “criminal implications”.
Asked by CBS News correspondent Ed O’Kif, whether he feels Obama is guilty of treason, Gabbard replied that he would give up criminal allegations for the Department of Justice, but said what happened “can be described as a year -long coup and a traitor conspiracy against American people.”
He refused to answer another question directly from O’Kif how the latest rejected documents change the previous assessment, given that the Senate Intelligence Committee-which included the then-Sen. Marco is dedicated to the analysis of the Rubio-Khukfia community, a full quantity of its five-volume investigation.
,[W]E is making sure that the intelligence community is not being politicized, Gabbard said. “Look at the evidence and you will know the truth.”
The Republican-writer’s report of the House Committee criticizes the 2017 intelligence community assessment, or review of the review of the evaluation in the ICA, which included its production for several reasons, which was issued before taking over to Mr. Trump. It also claimed that analysts failed to consider admirable alternative explanation for Putin’s intentions and questioned whether they enough to take into account the inspirations of the human source, there is proximity to Putin or prejudice to Trump.
The GOP House Committee report is subject to “suspected interpretation” by analysts that the report of a human source is on a piece of intelligence.
“Wide piece (shown in bold) is part of a sentence [redacted] It reads, ‘Putin took this decision [to leak DNC emails] When he came after assuming that the Democratic candidate had a better position to win the US presidential election, and he [candidate Trump] Whose victory was Putin’s count, Most likely, a bullet on page 4 of a bullet report says, “a solid win will not be able to pull.”
It says that a senior CIA operating officer said at the time, “We don’t know what it meant” and “five people read it five ways.”
Conclusions align in many areas with a separate tradecraft Review The CIA director John Ratcliffe was released earlier this month, determining that the level of confidence in this assessment that Putin aspires to help Trump to win, should have been mainly “liberals” than “high,” instead of “high,” because it was taken from a source instead. However, the CIA report did not include no detailed discussion of sensitive sources or methods involved.
CIA’s own review of intelligence, which informed about the discovery of Putin’s preference, “confirmed that the clause was accurately represented … and that the ICA writers were most consistent with raw intelligence.” It was more broadly found that most of the analysis of the underlying tradecraft in the 2017 evaluation was “strong and consistent” with analytical standards.
The CIA refused to comment on the report released by Gabard.
Democrats captured the time of the revelations – which he said that earlier could have been made at any time during the Trump administration at any time or second time since he took office.
Jim Hems, a member of the House Intelligence Committee Ranking, said, “It is appropriate that this shoddy and participation report was released by director Gabbard, when the House Republican is quite literally running away from Washington, DC, rather than issuing Epstein files, for six weeks,” House Intelligence is fierce to cover trump, “House Intelligence Committee Ranking Jim Hims said.
DNI has implemented the “crowd and unusual ‘declaration’ process, I am afraid that public release of this report may compromise on sensitive sources and methods and endanger our national security,” Hims said.
Ed O’Kif contributed to this report.
