NewNow you can hear Fox News article!
On July 15, President Trump nominated my friend and former Golrsch clerk aide Eric Tung in the US Court of Appeal for the ninth circuit. If confirmed, the Tung Judge will succeed Sandra Ekuta, who recently assumed a senior position after a prestigious term. Judge Ekuta leaves behind a strong heritage, a Tung is equipped to maintain and expand.
Mike Davis: Emil Bow confirmed a win on the old
Tung’s credibility is extraordinary. He earned a philosophy degree from Yale in 2006 and graduated in 2010 with high honors from Chicago Law School University. Whereas, he served as the Managing Editor of the Chicago Law Review University, one of the most rigorous legal magazines in the country.
Eric Tung, a partner of Jones Day, performed a clerk for both Antonin Skallia and Neel Gorasch, a Senate is seen in the judiciary committee hearing. Tight President is nominated by Trump who fills an open seat in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Reuters)
After the law school, Tung did a clerk for two most respected jurists in the US: then-Judge Neil Gorasch Tenth circuit and Supreme Court Justice Antonin Skalia. These clerks are presented only to the legal elite. Even among that group, Tung stood outside.
Although President Trump during his first term during his first term, during his first term to balance the country’s most liberal federal appeal court outside DC, 16 were Democratic candidates from 29 active judges. Tung in place of Ikuta will not change that balance, but will ensure that the empty seat remains in the hands of a strong constitutional.
Tung’s talent, morality and nature have earned him a bilateral honor. A letter supporting his nomination was signed by the Clerks of the Supreme Court, from Justice Ginsburg to Justice Ginsburg to Justice Thomas. That level of cross-cardamom support is rare and speaks volume.
A signator, Daniel Susoon, a former federal prosecutor who publicly disagreed with the Trump administration, went out of his way to support Tung. His support underlines how wide he praises for his intellect and integrity, regardless of politics.
Finally, what really matters is Tung’s record, and it is ineffective. He is a magnificent legal mind, a fair -minded jurist and a committed constitutional.
Tung’s experience is far ahead of the top of the legal profession. He served in the office of the legal policy of the Department of Justice, where he helped the judicial nominees, making him a first look at him to make him a good judge. As an assistant American Attorney in Los Angeles, he prosecuted serious criminal cases, gaining an invaluable court experience. Now a partner in Jones Day, Tung handles a national level complex appellate and testing task.
Although President Trump during his first term during his first term, during his first term to balance the country’s most liberal federal appeal court outside DC, 16 were Democratic candidates from 29 active judges. Tung in place of Ikuta will not change that balance, but will ensure that the empty seat remains in the hands of a strong constitutional.
Committee Chairman Sen Dick Durbin, D-Il., Speak during the hearing of the Senate Committee on the judiciary, to condemn the things that he did not even say. (AP Photo/Mark Sheffelbin)
Despite this impeccable record, Tung’s Senate Judicry Committee was heard by partisan theaterics. Many Democrat Senators ignored his merit and corrected the social media posts written by me. Sen Dick Durbin, D-Il. Tung, keeping in mind the canon of judicial morality, refused to weigh properly, clarifying that my opinion is not necessary.
Sen Kori Booker, DNJ, followed the suit, hit Tung on a post, where I labeled some Democrats “Evil Marxists”. Booker then attempted to cast himself as a model of bipartisan citizenship, citing his friendship with Sen John Kennedy, R-La, was easily abandoned that he once claimed that he was “complex in evil.” Again, Tung refused to be attracted to political grandeur, showing restraint and poetry we should expect a federal judge.
This crime-by-association line of the attack is dishonest and irrelevant. Tung’s record speaks for himself. Instead of joining with their legal qualities, some senators tried to hear another judiciary committee to score cheap political points. Tung never took fodder.
Click here for more Fox News Rai
His enrollment also highlights the double standard in treating judicial diversity. As the son of Chinese immigrants and a fluent mandarin speaker, one feels that the democrats at least tight will be celebrated to the federal bench representing and diversity for their sacred matrix. But because he is a conservative, his background has been reduced, or also used against him. The selective celebration of diversity and identity politics in judicial nomination is shining.
Finally, what really matters is Tung’s record, and it is ineffective. He is a magnificent legal mind, a fair -minded jurist and a committed constitutional. His combination of court room experience, educational hardness and moral clarity makes him an ideal appellate judge.
Click here to get Fox News app
The Senate should rise above the political posture and confirm Eric Tung without delay. Their confirmation will not only strengthen the ninth circuit, but will also strengthen the rule of nationwide law. The federal judiciary of President Trump will take a significant step further with the appointment of Tung, resoving with the royal, constitutional judges.
Eric Tung is actually like the judge Americans: fast, stable and clearly fair. The Senate should take action on its return and confirm it in September.
Mike Davis is the founder and chairman of the Article III Project.
