New Delhi: Last month, ‘Honeymoon Murder’ executed by a woman in Meghalaya with the help of her lover re -applies in a 2003 murder case in which the Supreme Court has upheld the sentence of life imprisonment to women and her companions including her lover, but what makes women drive to commit such heartless offenses.In the case at hand, the 20-year-old woman, a third-year law student at a Bengaluru College, was in love with her classmate, but her parents, unaware of her secret contact, took her to a family friend’s software engineer son on 30 November 2003.Two days after the engagement, she told her future husband to take her out for dinner. After dinner, he insisted on staying at the ‘Air View Point’ on the ring road of the airplane, to see the landing of the airplane. She was constantly messaging her lover and her comrades about her location, as Sonam Raghuvanshi did her alleged frightening plan. The attackers came with an iron rod and attacked the software engineer over the head from behind. The man died of head injury. Although a bench of Justices MM Sundresh and Arvind Kumar retained the life imprisonment given to him and his companions, felt that young life should not be completely ruined and allowed to apologize to the Karnataka Governor.While writing the decision, Justice Sundarsh said, “This unfortunate incident would not have happened, the family had more sympathy to understand the mental prediction and nature of the woman.”The three convicts, who were barely out of their teenage years, have now reached a middle age and the court realized that they are entitled to a new lease of life. Finding that there was no unfavorable comment against him during his lasting two decades, the bench said, “They were not born of criminals, it was an error of decision through a dangerous adventure work that led to a commissioned of a heinous crime. At this stage it is difficult for us to decide who affected the other, although there is a clear meeting of the brain.,The court said, “We would like to facilitate the rights of the appellants by permission to file a appropriate petition before the Governor of Karnataka. We will only request the Constitutional Authority to consider the same, which we hope and trust will be given to pay attention to the relevant circumstances that control the matter.”Discussing the social pressure and circumstances forcing women to commit crime, Justice Sundaresh said, “A woman is pushed into a dark corner by external elements that contribute enough to inequalities in her life. A woman’s thoughts will be separated based on that place, person and group.,
