NewNow you can hear Fox News article!
The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed the Trump administration to move forward, at least for now, with a plan to implement large -scale cuts in the federal workforce, a migration that enhances the prohibition of the lower court against the administration’s executive order.
In the 6-3 judgment, Justice provided the emergency request filed by the White House last week, clearing the way for the executive order number 14210, while legal challenges play the ninth circuit and potentially in the High Court.
The order directs federal agencies to wide cuts in force (RIFs) and agency reorganization.
It has been described by the administration officials as a valid attempt to “streamline the government and eliminate waste”. Critics, including Labor Unions, local governments and non -profit organizations, argue that the Presidents are illegally bypassing the Congress to eliminate the major parts of the Union Government.
Federal Appelles Court throws roadbollock in the education reform agenda of Trump
US President Donald Trump answered questions during a press conference on the recent Supreme Court’s decision in the briefing room at the White House at Washington, DC on 27 June 2025. (Joe Redal/Getty Images)
The majority in the court insisted that this specific agency was not ruling the validity of the deduction, only the executive order.
The court wrote, “Because the government is likely to succeed on its argument that executive orders and memorandum are valid – and because the impact on other factors that are satisfied to live – we give grants to the application,” the court wrote. “We do not express any views on the validity of any agency RIF and restructuring plan for the executive order and memorandum.
The order was blocked by the district court in California in May, called it an overache. But the Supreme Court’s non -signed decision on Tuesday separated the prohibition, pending appeal. The majority said that the government is “likely to succeed” in defending the validity of the order.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson forcedly disgruntled, wrote that “this court now sees fit to step into and leave the President’s debris at the beginning of this litigation.” He warned that the executive action represents a “structural overhaul that highlights the policy -making privileges of the Congress” and accused of acting prematurely in the emergency posture without fully understanding the facts.
Trump Administrator asks Scots that it allows to move forward with a plan to slash the federal workforce
The majority in the court insisted that this specific agency was not ruling the validity of the deduction, only the executive order. (Nicholas Economo/Narfoto through Getty Image)
He wrote, “This unilateral decision to ‘change’ the federal government was quickly challenged in the federal court.” “The District Judge investigated the entire evidence, considered the implemented law, and made a logical determination that the executive branch authorities should be included by implementing compulsory reorganization … but the temporary, practical, protection that reducing the status quo should be involved in an emergency post for this court to legally compete for this President’s legitimate action.”
The executive order issued in February directed the agencies to prepare an immediate plan for restructuring and workforce deductions, including “non-matrimonous” or “not compulsory not compulsory”. The administration says that this is an essential response to the bloated government and old structures, claiming that the prohibition was “forcing thousands of employees to maintain thousands of employees whose federal service is continuously in the government and public interest.”
Labor unions and state officials opposed the plan, saying that it is beyond the general workforce management and can serve in many agencies. They point to the proposed deduction of more than 50% in the Department of Energy, and about 90% for national business safety and health.
Justice of the US Supreme Court poses for his official photo in Supreme Court in Washington, DC on October 7, 2022 (Olivier Dauli/AFP through Getty Image)
The court’s decision is not a final decision on the validity of the executive order. This only determines that the implementation may temporarily proceed during the appeal continuing. If the ninth circuit enhances prohibitory orders or the Supreme Court later declined to take the case, the order can be stopped again.
The American Federal Government Employment Union had a forced response: “Today’s decision has given a serious blow to our democracy and puts services that Americans trust in serious threat. This decision does not change the simple and clear fact that the government’s actions and do not take any decisions about our constitution. We do not have any decision to protect the matter. We have to argue to protect this matter. We do. “
Click here to get Fox News app
The case is of Trump vs. American Federation of Government Employees.
White House Principal Deputy Press Secretary Harrison Fields wrote to Fox News Digital in an email, “Today’s US Supreme Court’s decision is another fixed victory for the President and his administration.” “It clearly reprimands the constitutionally authorized executive powers of the President by leftist judges who are trying to prevent the President from acquiring government proficiency in the federal government.”
