Getty imagesSome councils say that despite the appeal decision, they are taking legal action to prevent shelter seekers from being kept in hotels in their areas.
The court on Friday overturned a temporary prohibition, which would prevent shelter seekers from being kept in Bell Hotel in Eating, and was seen as a possible example for legal challenges elsewhere in the country.
Two councils told the BBC that they would continue to take legal action. The Epping Forest District Council, who received the prohibition, said it is looking at the options, including appealing to the Supreme Court.
Improvement UK said that all 12 councils should find this control legal options The shelter seekers are being kept in local hotels.
The leader of the reform-controlled West Northamptonshire Council said that Friday’s decision did not change his plan to take legal action about hotels in the area, which he said “already running”.
Clar Mark Arnul said: “It also does not change our view that the use and locations of three hotels are never suitable for asylum housing and keep inappropriate and unstable stress on local services.”
He said: “We will continue to do everything within our powers to remove the concerns of our residents at these hotels and keep them safe.”
Hertfordshire’s conservative -operated Broxborn Council also said that it would press with legal action.
Clar Jim Calloon told the BBC Radio 4 program: “We have serious concerns that from the perspective of the plan, the hotel or campus is not being used when the plan was allowed.”
In its original case, Epting Forest argued that the Bell Hotel had become an alleged plan law violation with a public safety risk, arguing that it had stopped working as a true hotel.
The leader of the Epping Forest District Council on Saturday told the BBC that it was “looking at all the options, including appealing to the Supreme Court”.
A full High Court is expected to hear a permanent prohibitory verification for the Bell Hotel in mid-October, but Clar Chris Whitbrede said that the Conservative-Run Council will get to plan its next steps on Monday.
He told the BBC breakfast that the decision “people are very disappointed” and hoping that the protests near the hotel will continue.
“I don’t think it will change, people want the hotel to be closed”. He said, urged people to perform peacefully.
Three arrests were made A protest outside the hotel on Friday Decision after the appeal court. Thousands of people participated in protests against the hotel and the counter-demonstration there in summer.
Meanwhile, Times Informed It was understood that at least 13 councils planned to move forward with legal action.
In his judgment on Friday, Lord Justice Bean said that there was a decision to give prohibition of the High Court. “Searishly faulty in theory” And 138 failed to consider the result of transferring asylum seekers, which were forced to leave the Bell Hotel by 12 September.
He also said that it was “worrisome” that the council’s legal team cited protests outside the hotel as it wanted for a reason. Original prohibition,
Lord Justice Bean said in his judgment: “If the outbreak of protest increases a case, it risks the risk of acting as an inspiration for further protest – some of which may be disorganized – around asylum.”
“There is a risk of encouraging iniquity further.”
The protests began after arresting the shelter kept in the hotel and later accused of several crimes, including sexual harassment of a 14 -year -old girl. Hadush Cabtu denies crimes and is Has been on test,
The Chief Executive of the Refugee Council said that the court of appeal decision “did not solve the problems we are facing”.
Enfor Solomon told BBC Breakfast on Saturday: “This does not address the fact that the taxpayer has to pay millions of pounds a day for the hotel, and those who are in the hotel feel that they have got a target on their back.”
He said that the government had “proceeding very fast” for the government to eliminate the use of hotels for homemakers – which it is committed to 2029 – and suggested that it made a plan “to close hotels in the coming months”.
Border Security and asylum Minister Dame Angela Eagle said after the verdict that the government is “not a permanent solution until the end of this Parliament, which will stop using the hotel”.
“This decision helps us to do so in a planned and systematic fashion”.
