Opposition Vice Presidential Candidate Justice (Retired) B Sudarsen Reddy (Excerpt)What did you do to join the VP post competition in the time considered highly polarized?Society is becoming increasingly polarized. This should be stopped because I believe the biggest threat does not come from the gauve alone in democracy, but this danger itself comes from citizens when they try to divide the society on the basis of religion, caste, language and region. To arrest this trend, I thought about this election.I am a generous constitutional democrat and I want to be chosen as the VP of the country to protect and protect the Constitution of India. My duty was to maintain the constitution. This is the difference between a judge and vice -president and the oath given to the President of India.What do you have to say that numbers are already diagonally in favor of NDA?You know that there is no whip, do not vote like political parties. It is a member of Parliament who vote and it is a secret voting. The business of the political party should not enter the region. Parties can select their candidate but eventually the voters are members of the Parliament. Therefore, I do not understand this fight of numbers … I am very optimistic and going to appeal to all members of all political parties and I will formally issue a letter while addressing all MPs soon.How do you criticize your decision to dissolve HM Amit Shah-Maaoist Salwa Judam Military, and give a verdict to the BJP through a judicial prejudice?This is their choice. There are six balls in an over. There is nothing after the sixth ball. I think 5 or 6 are probably already over. Some are spinners, some are fast bowlers. Some spin they are trying. The most unfortunate thing is that if they read the decision, no one will make such comments. We were speaking about the threat of violence in the decision of Salwa Judam. I further said that it is the constitutional duty and responsibility of the state to protect the rights and freedom of its citizens. I said that whenever necessary for the safety of the society, you cannot outsource your right to use weapons. I said that please perform your duties and do not include these innocent tribals.What do you have to say about Shah’s criticism of your decision on the expulsion of security forces from school buildings, where they were recorded as part of the anti -Maoist opes?In those Maoist areas, children who are going to school? They hardly have any facilities and whatever schools existed were under the control of security forces giving children the right to educate children. Apart from the right to the Education Act, the Constitution also gives them that right. Should I assume that powerful states are unable to provide housing to their security forces and have occupied school and college buildings. What is this that I said? You have taken away the school building, let the school run.If a judge discharges his constitutional obligation, the interpretation of the constitution can be established according to the law, which can be dubbed and painted as a prejudice tomorrow. God, if someone is there, then save this country.18 Your response to the statement of former-judges supports you and about 56 other people?What do I say about it? I mean when I say divisive forces are at work. I should thank the writers of 56 colleagues – who have signed or not … they gave me unwanted advice that this is a political competition, you face it. I never asked him whether this is a political competition or not because I am repeatedly saying that it is a high constitutional office.What is the RS Nomination and C accepted by the East-CJI Ranjan Gogoi about the criticism of former judges seeking constitutional postsIn 1967, oncorn about the fairness of the judiciary when the former-CJI Sabba Rao contested for the VP post.I will not speak about a specific person. I am not asking anyone to nominate me. I am demanding an election to appeal to MPs to consider my candidature on merit. Former CJI Sabba Rao was attacked to write Golaknath decision, where you prepare the original and base that the fundamental rights cannot be replaced by Parliament. A foundation is laid in that decision about the original structure. Later, Kesavanand Bharti only made it clear that it is not that no part of the Constitution can be amended... It is not as if no part of fundamental rights can be modified, but the basic structure of the Constitution cannot be amended. Perhaps those who believed at that time that anything and everything could be amended and that Nyaya Rao was coming on the way through Golknath, so he removed an attack.In Salwa Judam, I was talking about social justice, people’s preamble, ideal inherent in civil rights and freedom and a constitutional principle that the state alone has a monopoly of using weapons to reduce violence. It cannot rent the services of an organized group. The moment you speak about some values ​​in the Constitution, it is not tasty for something, they start spinning it.You are meeting leaders of various opposition parties. Your response to the competition is being implicated as Tamil Proud vs Telugu? Your response to YSRCP supporting NDA candidate?Answer: This nation is one. India which is India is a union of states. There is no separate citizenship for Tamil Nadu and Telangana. Neither Shri CP Radhakrishnan ji has chosen to be born in Tamil Nadu nor Justice Sudarsan Reddy chose to be born in Telangana. Hence there is nothing like Telangana vs Tamil Nadu. As far as YSRCP is concerned, it is the choice of their political leadership, but I don’t know what their MPs will do because there is no whip and it is a secret voting. Therefore, why should I not appeal to everyone to consider my candidature for the Vice President on voting.
