The government is demanding an appeal to the High Court’s refusal so that it allows to intervene in a hotel case, which was used for shelter seekers in the applying.
Earlier this week, the Epping Forest District Council was given a temporary prohibition to prevent people from placing people from placing them at Bell Hotel.
The court refused to try the last minute attempt to Home Secretary Yett Cooper to dismiss the council case.
If it is successful in its new appeal to be an interested party, then the government is expected to consider another appeal against the ruling itself.
Home Office Minister Dan Jarvis said that the government was committed to closure of all asylum hotels, but “we need to do so in a managed and order manner”.
“And that’s why we will appeal to this decision,” he said.
A senior source in the home office said that it was a case of “democracy” and the judiciary should not be able to tell the government where he can keep and not.
In recent weeks, thousands of people have gathered near the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, who was accused of sexual harassment of a 14 -year -old girl in the city for protesting after an asylum.
Bringing its case, the Epping Council argued that the presence of the hotel is “already a clear risk of advancing community tension at a high level, and the risk of irreparable loss to the local community”.
Before handing over the verdict, the Home Office asked to intervene in the case, warning that the court’s decision could have its ability to “considerable impact” for shelter seekers in hotels in the UK.
The court ruled in favor of the EPING Council and said that 140 asylum seekers would have to leave the hotel up to 16:00 BST on 12 September.
Since the verdict, more than half a dozen councils have said that they were considering taking equal legal action.
