Jeffrey Epstein’s former Associate Ghhishline is arguing against Maxwell’s attempt to ignore the grand jury testimony against him, writing in a court in the court on Tuesday, writing in a court that his customer has “no option but to oppose potentially” potential release.
“Jeffrey Epstein is dead. Ghislane is not Maxwell,” Maxwell’s Attorney David Marcus wrote in one Nine page filing“Whatever the public may be interested in Epstein, the interest in a case in a case cannot be correct a comprehensive infiltration in the grand jury privacy where the defendants are alive, their legal options are viable, and their proper procedure remains rights.”
Maxwell – Who is serving 20 years Jail sentence for minors recruitment, grooming and sexually abused – Challenge his beliefArguing that he should have been covered with a non-dissemination deal that federal prosecutors in Florida introduced Epstein and any co-speculators about two decades ago. The Supreme Court indicated that it would consider whether to listen to Maxwell’s case in September.
His lawyers also wrote that Maxwell has not been given an opportunity to review the grand jury content to assess the documents.
“When Epstein died, the prosecutors of the Southern district of New York posed and made Maxwell the face of his crimes. He became a sacrifice of sacrifice and the only person who could put the government in the case. He was convicted in a media firstorm of a media firstorm of false reporting and misunderstandings of evidence.” “Now, due to pending in his case before the Supreme Court, the government tries to ignore uncontrollably, hearing-laden grand jury tapes, including secretly presented statements and never challenged by adverse procedure. Maxwell has never been allowed to review those tapes, even if the government has not opposed his recent requests to do so.”
Last week, in filing in a court, the Department of Justice admitted that the grand jury said that it was trying to ignore the investigation of late sexual criminal Jeffrey Epsustin and his former colleague Ghisla Maxwell. Only two laws testify with enforcement officers,
The grand doers inspired by Epstein and Maxwell did not listen to direct testimony from any alleged victims, Attorney General Bandi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanch told a judge in the southern district of New York in their efforts to ignore the testimony.
One in Admit the first TuesdayThe Department of Justice said that it was hoping that the grand jury tape has been ignored, mostly already made public during Epstein and Maxwell’s court proceedings.
The Department of Justice wrote, “Attached, anotated tape suggests that a lot of information provided during the Grand Jury testimony – some victims and witnesses were made publicly available in the case with the exception of identification or otherwise publicly reported through public statements of victims and witnesses,” Written by the Department of Justice.
The government has also asked to decide by August 8 whether they are asking to ask for the performance of the Grand Jury or not, as well as as “original” performances that are not in public records.
Prior to a separate judge in New York this week, two victims of Epstein asked to ban the couple’s victims, but were unopposed to be uncontrolled.
A victim asked the judge to “show us all the files with only the required reduction!” And “can be done with it and allow me to heal.”
He asked that his lawyers are able to review the suggested reduction “because they are those who know the victims, their names, their truths and their stories unlike the United States government, who did not even care to know our truth.
Another victim said to review the third-party of the files before his release, “To ensure that no aggrieved names or similarities are revealed through this release. It is necessary with an investigation into the frenzy of this media that the victims are fully and fully preserved.”
Last month, a federal judge in Florida rejected The Department of Justice requested to ignore the grand jury content arising out of the investigation in Epstein in the state in 2005 and 2007. This decision only applies to the tape of action by the federal Grand Jerse which was convened in Florida, and not applied to the tape in New York.
Trump administration may release parts of Maxwell-Blanch conversation
Last month end, blanch Meet with maxwell During two days. There is now a discussion between the officials of the Trump administration as to whether some of those conversations are to be made public, sources familiar with the matter told CBS News on Tuesday.
Blash Said Last month, the Department of Justice “will share additional information about whatever he learned at the appropriate time.” It is not clear what subjects they have covered: Marcus has Said Maxwell was asked about “100 different people” and answered “every question”, but Is not wide On the substance of their conversation.
An administration official confirmed that there is a transcript of the blanch discussion with audio and maxwell, a standard exercise for legal interviews.
CNN was first reported on the discussion about the release of Blanches-Maxwell conversations.
Asked for the comment, White House spokesman Stephen Chewing said, “It’s nothing more than CNN, which is trying hard to make news out of old news.”
Mr. Trump told Newsmax a few days ago that “we want to release everything, but we do not want people who do not hurt who did not hurt.”
Contributed to this report.
