William Shipli: Durham Annex tells us about Rousaygate Hocx

On 31 July and 1 August, the New York Times on May 23, 2023 launched two stories by pouring cold water on the release of “Anex” already classified for the report of Special Advocate John Durham. But with the help of a non-integrated to start the attention of the writer-Calli Savez and Adam Goldman-Ne’s readers, “.

This is the base on which The Times, Washington Post, Politico, Network News and other Legacy Media have focused their reporting on the FBI’s crossfire storm investigation by President Trump – which we know that the FBI, CIA and Obama were “fake” by the White House.

Jonathan Turley: Democrats pulled out the biggest political cone job on Americans so far. It is unwelling in the end

In a part of Durham’s investigation, it was observed that the FBI received Russian intelligence at the end of July 2016 – really – really – as the opposite was that the FBI received about 60 days of information from an Australian diplomat about a meeting in London.

The attachment in the first part of 2016 includes information already classified on the receipt of “special intelligence” from a friendly foreign government, showing the real -time knowledge of the internal machines of Russia’s Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign.

Annex is a document written by Durham’s team. Since the source documents on which the Russian memo based were not provided to them – or at least not made public – the accuracy of the contradiction/context of the Russian memo for source documents is unknown. They all go to the work of qualifiers “analysis” – what is this document, where it originates, what it says, what it depends, whether it can be confirmed separately, what is our level in accepting the material, which is accurately accurate at the marked price, etc.

The two items that have attracted the most attention, and on which the Times stories focus are “emails”, written by Leonard Bernardo on 25 July and 27 July 2016. Bernardo worked for a unit related to George Soros. His emails were hacked, and he had communication with senior Clinton Abhiyan officials.

The attachment does not have a real “email” because you can find them on Bernardo’s computer or a recipient’s computer – they do not have any specific email formatting. What they appear are the “retiped” versions of the text in the body of the email in a Russian language memorandum, the Russian memorandum was translated into English, with Durham with cutting and pasting the “English translation in his report”.

The “email” of 25 July involves allegations that Hillary Clinton approved a plan imagined by a “foreign policy advisor” that incorrectly connect him to the Russian President to “Vilify” Donald Trump. Putin.

For the Russian language memorandum – we do not know the date – Durham provides an English translation that includes the following:

“According to data from Hillary Clinton’s Election Campaign Headquarters received through US Soros Foundation, on July 26, 2016, Clinton approved a plan by his policy advisor Juliana Smith … Donald Tram tied up in the pre-fuzzy process to benefit Donald Trump.”

The Russian memorandum says “as is imagined by Smith …”. This suggests that the documents that support the memo describe Smith’s plan either is familiar with Smith or someone else with the details to describe it.

“As is imagined by Smith, by increasing the theme of ‘Putin’s support for Trump’ to the level of the Olympic scam, Clinton’s compromise will attract the attention of components from the investigation of electronic correspondence.”

The Russian memorandum, which was to be written after July 27, had material from an email of July 27, exactly suggests what happened for the election in the next 100 days – “Putin’s support for Trump was the goal of” Planning “.

Russian memo proceeds:

“… later to take public opinion towards this notion that it is that it [the public] In order to influence political processes through cyberspace in the United States, ‘Putin’s efforts’ needs to work against equally important infrastructure (attained to the National Power Supply Network) [read “OBAMA”] Ra-A-Vis Moscow to use more collision landscapes…. ,

Memo says the Clinton campaign will try to blow the importance of Russian election intervention – which takes place in every election – for attack on the important national infrastructure, and attempts to connect Putin and Trump together, that is, any electoral intervention by Putin is actually a proxy to attack democracy by Trump.

FBI’s controversial Trump-Russia works predicted by foreign actors with ‘dangerous uniqueness’: Source: Source

Either Russian intelligence services are cleravories and should play a lottery every week, or they deviated into a contingent of correspondence among people associated with the Clinton Abhiyan, describing the game plan executed by the campaign, and the White House, CIA and FBI on their behalf.

The email of July 27, responsible for Bernardo, is also relatively low in the context of determining Durham as a word taken from the Russian memorandum, and confirms that Clinton has approved “Julia’s view”.

The authors of the Times wrongly stated that Durham called two Bernardo emails “fake” – and said that he was “concocted” by Russian intelligence. Therefore, according to the Times, all the disputes around the release of attachment material were made irrelevant by that discovery.

But Durham did not conclude that emails were fake. What did he conclude?

His team’s “best assessment” was that he was “composite” – some part of each text was taken from other sources and was combined in the text that appeared as “email” under Bernardo’s name.

It is clear that Bernardo did not write them, that is, they are not “authentic”.

But it is also clear that some amount of materials in each was accurate – and the estimated events were predicted which would be revealed in the next 100 days.

Durham reached the conclusion that was designed only after a long and included process, designed to understand both emails, and how accurate the contents of special intelligence were.

Everything – and I mean everything – Durham did not to answer the questions that the FBI had chosen to do in or after August 2016.

Durham asked intelligence analysts – FBI and CIA probably – if emails appear authentic. Most said that they did. Some said that Bernardo was actually a victim of hacking by Russians, so it would not be surprising that his emails were in the hands of Russians. It was noted by some people that the Russians coined or replaced the original information taken from the source documents.

Just the fact that some analysts believed that emails seem authentic, the FBI should have been sufficient to push into action. But it did nothing.

Durham interviewed Bernardo and showed them emails. The FBI never did this. Bernardo said he did not recognize them, and he had language that he would not have used – especially the sentence “Later the FBI would put more oil in the fire.”

Intelligence translated from a foreign language is difficult to view information. Bernardo refused using that phrase, but how far is that more than a very similar phrase is usually used by a native English speaker – “Pour gas on fire”? Bernardo’s original documents would be in English – then translated into Russian – then the Russian version translated back into English. It is that “gas on fire” ends as “oil in fire”.

Bernardo also said that he did not know that “Julie” was referred to in the July 25 email.

But he said that the last sentence in the July 25 email-“Things are frightening for us”-for the relationship “for the relationship he would write.

Durham collected documents with a grand jury subponus and search warrant. He searched for documents obtained by Russian hackers. For 25 July and July 27 email, Durham did not find those from the email of the Soros Foundation.

But they get other emails – either with emails or attachments for emails sent by people other than Bernardo – with the same language. In particular, a route in the July 25 email was taken directly from an email written by Tim Maure, who worked as a cyber expert for Carnegie Endowment. Maur had never seen the Bernardo email, but agreed that a route was taken from an email that he had sent to colleagues in Carnegie – was also hacked by Russians.

Durham also interviewed Julian Smith, who was a Clinton Abhiyan Foreign Policy Advisor, and who included himself in the efforts to increase the danger of Putin-Class Relations for American national security.

Click here for more Fox News Rai

It is noteworthy that Durham starts this part as follows:

“Smith said she does not remember the proposal of a plan to especially Clinton or other campaign leadership to try to tie Trump from Putin and Russia.”

This phrase is never accidental – “especially not remembered” leaves a lot of space to remove yourself if a document later emerges that says what it is what it is that you claim to not remember. Agents are trained to note such phrases, as were being interviewed by the individual.

Smith said “this was possible” he had proposed views to lead the campaign “who would have approved those ideas.” Again – Durham is showing his email about a “Clinton Yojana”, which he has accepted, and he may not be convinced that what other documents he has that he is not showing him.

Click here to get Fox News app

While she did not remember anything about anything, one thing that she was sure is that she would never have made a proposal that used to carry forward the FBI participation attempt as part of its execution.

Before Durham, the FBI did not do any of it – and never gave clarification for this.

This was the point created by Durham’s annex.

Click here for more than William Shiple