Political Reporter, BBC Wells News
Originally a farm purchased using taxpayers’ money for a sick festival project by the Welsh government has lost £ 500,000 in the price.
The giltstone farm in Pavis was originally purchased for £ 4.75 m but Plan to help owners of Green Man Festival When Operas began to hunt nest there, he was released.
A SenedD committee report has raised “serious concerns” as to how the site was acquired, and a review demanded.
The Welsh government said that it would “continue to find out possible opportunities for its future use”.
The then Economics Minister Von Getting said that the government was “pleased” in the beginning of 2024. Two nests osting aspires In gilstone farm.
But this discovery ended a plan that could see the businessman behind the Green Man extended to a new site.
Getting, who later gave a small tenure as the first minister during the same year, Refused to waste money,
The main music and art festival under the proposals may have been in the cricketer, but a company founded by Green Man director Fiona Stewart wanted to use the farm for other events.
Opposition politicians criticized the purchase of the farm – officials entered the talks to lease Ms. Stewart without an initial commercial plan.
After the discovery of Ospreys, a 750 meter (2,460ft) restricted area was advised around the nest, which can be seen Live on the internet,
An audit report earlier found that the use of unexpected funds by the end of the financial year had to be used. Why the site was purchased, “most important” factor,
The property is currently leased to a farm on “commercial conditions”.
‘not strong’
In an important report, Sendd’s public accounts and administration committee stated that the decision was taken with “lack of hard work”.
The plans “were not sufficiently strong and were not communicated effectively with the community”, said this.
This added failure to keep sufficient records of meetings with the Green Man officials, which meant that SenedD was “unable to thoroughly investigate and evaluate the decisions taken by the Welsh government”.
The report said that even those who decide in the Welsh government were not given information about the purchase on time.
The committee stated that the “haste” that the government may have bought the site, has also disrupted its ability to identify risks around the presence of wildlife “which will affect its proposals for the site, and potentially, its value”.
The report said, “This is especially notable because the site is now considered £ 3.75M, which means that the value of half a million pounds is lost in the assets of the Welsh government.”
Committee Chairman Mark Isharwood said: “The arrival of the osteopzes on the site was unexpected and it is accepted that the Welsh government has given a positive reply to this development to preserve its residence, although there was evidence of other protected species being present at the site at the time of procurement.
“However, the future of the site now seems to be very uncertain, with the most recent evaluation showing that the value has decreased by £ 0.5M compared to the property purchase price. This is highly regrettable.”
The committee called for a complete review of the procurement process and the Chief Civil Servant of Welsh Government, Permanent Secretary Andrew Goodol, to “reflect significantly in the value of the land and what it could be reduced”.
A spokesperson of the Welsh government said: “Gillstone is one of the assets of the Welsh government’s assets and is being managed as a working farm on our behalf.
“We continue to find out possible opportunities for its future use, taking into account our commitment to find a permanent result that helps local communities to flourish.
“We will read the report of the committee with interest and reply in the appointed time.”