NewNow you can hear Fox News article!
A Texas person has filed a case of a landmark federal wrong death against the California miscarriage provider, in which the physician has accused his unborn children of “killing” miscarriage pills in state lines.
Case, Rodriguez vs. The Koetx marks the first of its kind to test how life-supporting litigants can go to blue state miscarriage shield laws using the century’s federal federal law and Texas Civil Code.
On July 20, the Sue was filed in the southern district of Texas, Dr. Remy COTEX accuses Koitex of supporting illegal self-managed abortion in 2024, which was allegedly used to eliminate two pregnancies in Galveston County, Texas, where they were reportedly used to end two pregnancies.
The plaintiff Jerry Rodriguez claims that his girlfriend’s estranged husband bought bullets from COTEX through a Venomo transaction and pressured them, to end two pregnancies Rodriguez says that he was.
Federal Judge Partly blocks the law that help adults to exclude minors
An ultrasound image on January 18, 2025, allegedly shows the unborn son of Jerry Rodriguez. An exhibit 2 was filed at Rodriguez vs. Cotox in the southern district of Texas. (Image filed in US District Court, Southern District of Texas)
The suit has an alleged $ 150 venamo payment in the heart “AED Axis” for “Remy Coatox MD PC”, followed by his girlfriend’s name. The lawsuit stated that Rodriguez has interpreted “AED Axis” as a phonetic spelling of “aid access”, a network that helps women receive abortion pills.
Rodriguez alleged that in September 2024 at the house of her girlfriend’s mother, and the second in January 2025, her husband’s first abortion occurred at her husband’s house. Ultrasound paintings from January are introduced as an exhibit 2, as a proof of a second pregnancy. According to the complaint, the child was a boy.
Rodriguez is demanding more than $ 75,000 in losses, authentication of a national class of “the father of unborn children”, and a permanent prohibition, preventing coatox from mailing abortion drugs in state or federal law violations.
Medical group Kennedy, FDA urges that extensive approval of abortion drugs
Mifepristone (mifeprex) and Misoprostol are two drugs used in a drug abortion. (Through Robin Bake/AFP Getty Image)
The legal foundation of the complaint has attracted attention. The prosecution revives the long -standing Composite Act, an 1873 Federal Federal Obsaining Obsaining Act that prohibits the mailing of abortion related materials. However, for more than a century, the Composite Act remains on books.
Jonathan Michelle, the lawyer behind the heartbeat law (SB8) of Texas represents Rodriguez in the case. He argues that Dr. Remy Koetx violated 18 USC and 1461 and 1462, the Federal Comstock Act, using the mail using the mail using the mail to send miscarriage-motivation drugs from California to Texas.
The suit also alleged that Koytox killed hooliganism under Texas Penal Code of 19.02, which is deliberately supporting an illegal abortion. It cites several violations of the Texas law, which include laws that require abortion drugs only to administered by state physicians, informed consent and after a compulsory ultrasound, and only on licensed abortion facilities. CoeyTaux, which is not licensed in Texas, was reportedly found to be any of those requirements.
Pro-Life Movement faces the rate of high abortion after three years after Dob
Washington, DC for abortion before the US Supreme Court and against abortion (Elison Robert/Washington Post Getty Image)
The case is already seen as a strategic test of Blue State Abortion Shield laws. States like California, New York and Washington have passed measures to protect their abortion providers from legal risks when treating patients outside the state.
But Rodriguez’s legal team avoided those obstacles by fileing a case of wrong death in the federal court directly, a step some legal scholars say that they can present a new route for anti-abortion plaintiff to reach the providers beyond the boundaries of their state.
Till Friday, court records suggest that Kotaux did not respond to the complaint, and he has not made any public statement about the case.
Click here to get Fox News app
Pro-Garbanth groups are expected to contest elections to bring both the interpretation of the Commental Act and to bring both the standing claims of the private citizens to the state’s telehland tied.
If the case avoids initial procedural obstacles, it can introduce a new template for life-supporting cases to target the supply chain of abortion pills three years after deciding the dobes in the Supreme Court.
COOYTAUX did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request to comment.
