NewNow you can hear Fox News article!
The White House is claiming that Russia was trying to sow “mistrust and anarchy”, even the Reports of the office of the Director of National Intelligence suggested the Obama administration “Russian intervention to reduce Trump’s victory in 2016” manipulated “manipulated”.
Press Secretary Karolin Lewitt was asked whether the state of State Secretary Marco Rubio fell to the office of the director of the new conclusions of National Intelligence on leading the Senate Intelligence Committee.
“He said that what he got is harassing,” Levit said, while on Wednesday, the White House was standing with the director of Tulsi Gabbard at the press briefing. “We found the irrefutable evidence of Russian medaling, which the director of National Intelligence confirmed to all of you that Russia was trying to sow mistrust and anarchy.”
“What anger in this – that Secretary Rubio did not say at that time, Democrats were saying at that time – the fact that the intelligence community was controlling the story that the President had collided with the Russians, that the President’s son was holding secret meetings with the Russians, all these were lies that were never true,” he continued.
Press Secretary Karolin Lewitt was asked whether the state of State Secretary Marco Rubio fell to the office of the director of the new conclusions of National Intelligence on leading the Senate Intelligence Committee. (Evelyn Hawkstein/Reuters)
New Rousgate evidence ‘directly points to Obama, DOJ will decide criminal implications’: Gabbard
In 2020, the Senate Intelligence Committee, led by the then-Sen. Rubio released a report in the 2016 election, searching for “irrefutable evidence” of Russian intervention. Now, Gabbard claims that Obama officials manipulated intelligence to reduce Trump’s victory by playing Russia’s works during the 2016 election.
But, Rubio said at that time, “We can say, without any hesitation, the committee did not find any evidence that the then candidate Donald Trump or his campaign paid attention to the 2016 election with the Russian government.”
He said that the report found “deep -harassing action” from the FBI, “especially his acceptance and desire to rely on ‘steel doseer’, without verifying its functioning or sourcing.”
Steel Dojier was funded by Hillary Clinton’s President’s Campaign and Law firm Perkins Koi by the Democratic National Committee.
Recently released documents Gabbard found that Intelligence showed that the 2016 election was “suppressed by Russian actors.”
The Obama administration asked the “construction and political intelligence” to make a story that Russia was trying to influence the 2016 presidential election, despite the information of the intelligence community, otherwise, Gabard claimed.
Gabbard also said that the dilapidated documents have been shared with the Department of Justice and the FBI so that the agencies can evaluate whether any criminal implication has been warned by the material.
Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbash replied to DNI’s claims: “Out of honor for the office of the presidential office, our office usually does not flow with a response to the continuous nonsense and misinformation exiting the White House. But these claims are sufficient for a merit.
He said, “Anything widely accepted in the document released last week underlines that Russia had worked to influence the 2016 presidential election, but did not successfully manipulate any vote. These findings were confirmed by the then 2020 report in a 2020 report under the leadership of the then Chairman Maro Rubio.”
Rubio’s office referred to Fox News Digital for Levit’s comments.
The director of the National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard claims that Obama officials manipulated intelligence to reduce Trump’s victory by playing Russia’s works during the 2016 elections. (Aaron Shwartz/CNP/Bloomberg via Getty Image)
Gabbard claims that Obama’s goal with the story of Russia was to ‘eliminate’ the will of the American people
The documents stated that intelligence officials found that Russia “probably not trying … to impress the election using cyber means.”
An example was on December 7, 2016 weeks after the election. Talking points of James Clapper, the then director of National Intelligence, stated: “Anti -foreign did not use a cyber attack on the infrastructure of the election to change the result of the US presidential election.”
In 2016, a President Dainik Abbrevia, prepared for President Barack Obama, evaluated: “Russian and criminal actors did not influence recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against the election infrastructure.”
But, the brief found, “Actors associated with the Russian government most likely compromised an Illinois Voter Registration Database and failed in other states.”
In 2016, a President Dainik Abbrevia, prepared for President Barack Obama, evaluated: “Russian and criminal actors did not influence recent US election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against the election infrastructure.” (“IMO” with Michelle Obama and Craig Robinson screenshot)
Brief said that it would have to change the official vote results of any state as a result of “it was a highly unlikely” attempt “.
“Criminal activity also failed to reach the necessary scale and sophistication to change election results,” said.
Brief said that the office of Director of National Intelligence assessed Russian activities, “probably intended to create psychological effects, such as the election process and reducing the reliability of the candidates.”
Click here to get Fox News app
Obama officials then leaked false statements for media outlets “according to Gabbard’s office,” claiming, “Russia attempted to intervene through cyber means, if not actively affected, the result of an election. ,
Brooke Singman of Fox News Digital contributed to this report.
