New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday challenged the order of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to the order of a Karnataka High Court, which canceled the proceedings against BM Parvati, wife of Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, in the Mureu Urban Development Authority (Muda) Land Allotment case.Chief Justice of India Bra Gavai and Justice. A bench of Vinod Chandran refused to entertain the petition, commenting on an oral observation, “fought the political battle among voters.“Mr. Raju (Additional Solicitor General SV Raju who was visible for ED), please do not force us to open our mouth. Otherwise, we will be forced to make some harsh comments about ED. Unfortunately, I have some experience in Maharashtra. Do not end this violence across the country. A political battle should be fought before the voters. Why are you being used, ”said CJI. The case includes allegations that Parvati found 14 high-value compensatory plots in Mysuru, allegedly around Rs 56 crore, in exchange for a 3.2-acre parcel, which Muda achieved from him. The land was originally gifted to him by his brother in 2010.Justice has become strong and ED intervention has been abolished in the case of turmoil: SiddaramaiahChief Minister Siddaramaiah welcomed the top court’s verdict, which was called “a step towards justice and a step for politically motivated intervention”.Citing media reports, the statement said: “The Supreme Court dropped the Ed notice in the Parvati and Bareti Suresh Muda case. He said that the matter should not be politicized. Fight your battle before the voter. Dismissed as they find no mistake in the order of the single judge learned. Justice has become strong and the ED intervention has been abolished in the case of Muda.,The controversy erupted after the ED issued summons to Parvati and State Urban Development Minister BS Suresh. In March, the summons was separated by the Karnataka High Court, destabilizing them. In her defense, Parvati said through senior advocate Sandhesh Chutta: “I am the wife of CM. I have a moral responsibility to ensure that such allegations should be submerged. I (14 sites) returned to the right right and it cannot be an entry of guilt.,Opposition parties have claimed that the scam could be as much as Rs 4,000 crore, accusing Mud of large -scale irregularities in the allocation of compensation sites.
